Bordeaux En Primeur 2022

I’m excited once again to start a thread on this year’s Bordeaux en primeur campaign, bdx22.

The trade tastings take place in situ the week after next, with visitor numbers promising to be significantly higher than at any time since the 2018 campaign pre-Corona. Now lockdowns in China are over, I expect we’ll see a large contingent from Hong Kong and the Mainland.

As every year, i spent a few weeks in Aquitaine from the last week of July through to the end of August. It was incredibly dry. Oak trees turned brown, leaves oven-crisp, creating a bizarre juxtaposition of an autumnal landscape and searing summer heat.

It felt quite a lot hotter than 2020, though nights were persistently fresher than you might imagine, and I wonder to what extent that may have helped shape wines that Julia described as having “concentration”, “richness” and “elegance”.

Here’s a link to Gavin Quinney’s comparative weather analysis.

Producers seemed genuinely enthused by the resultant juice in vat, one whom I met up with a couple of months’ ago intending to go as long as he possibly could in purchasing in-depth through his negociant business.

So onto the perennial question of pricing. The drumbeat of greatness is strikingly loud this year. Expect parallels to be drawn with post war vintages such as '47. It isn’t going to be cheap, and it’s likely going to be quite a bit more expensive than 2020. Those who bought the rich and elegant 2019s will be feeling pleased as this campaign rolls out.

Fuelling the expected increases are somewhat lower than average yields (though I have no doubt there’ll be plenty to go around) and price escalation in other fine wine regions, notably Burgundy and Champagne.

On paper, the run-up in Burgundy and vintage bubbly pricing might seem to be holding. That’s because secondary market retail prices aren’t yet being marked down. In practise the frothy end of those markets is now virtually unsaleable at current elevated levels. Prices of wines subject to speculation and consortia who attempt to corner a market have now peaked and we’ll likely see mark-downs during much of 2023.

Benchmarking Bordeaux increases to those markets based on published market data risks ‘informing’ increases that don’t reflect the reality of what’s currently happening; those markets are characterised by an awful lot of sellers relative to buyers. Buyers who are being increasingly cautious and therefore selective.

The world’s an increasingly uncertain place, and those geopolitical and inflationary fears are a potent mix when it comes impacting sentiment. Even the top end of the market least affected by grocery and energy price hikes are still affected by the same global concerns that impact everyone else, and these damp down discretionary spend.

This is the market reality against which bdx22 will be shown. Will the quality of the vintage and market exuberance trump all other concerns? Will price increases be accepted and hold? What will that do to demand and pricing for back vintages? I look forward forward to publishing our relative value analyses based on the reviews and scores awarded by Jancis and James, and participating in the ensuing conversations with forumites!

10 Likes

Thanks Nick, looking forward to your always insightful input, and that of the other forum contributors. Interesting comments on Burgundy above.

Why do I have a bad feeling about pricing for this Bordeaux campaign? Fingers crossed I suppose!

Let the games begin :-). Lots of discounting of vintages 2018 and 2019 in Hong Kong, so I can confirm what Nick is describing. Might a good year to focus on allocating funds to keep regular allocations and personal favourites that don’t usually show up in stores. Everything else seems to be available in abundance even ten years on at reasonable prices.

One thing to consider is rising interest rates - the opportunity costs have all of a sudden gone from basically zero to 4%+ a year (plus costs for storage) if one were to deposit cash rather than buy EP.

3 Likes

Looking forward to this valuable annual exercise (especially the comparative value assessments), even though I will likely be dead - I’m 80 - by the time the vintage is drinkable!

1 Like

I had decided to buy no more Bdx (I started with 1982. …). After the first reports of JM Quarin, I am no longer sure… It should be the best vintage he ever tasted en primeur.

I am a buyer in bottle ideally on release when the quality has usually been widely assessed by a multitude of critics, such as the 2020 vintage.

In general, except for unusually well priced vintages such as 2019 En Primeur, there seems too little incentive to participate in buying futures. The other exceptions would be when buying unusual bottle sizes that are harder to find later, buying for a birth or anniversary year which may not be available later on; or for those who have allocations to hugely demanded wines such as Petrus or Lafleur.

I do of course appreciate that Nick can point to relative values, always good to read and follow.

Marvellous!

A few tips from a trusted Bordeaux insider who has a tendency to get grumpy when the sugar levels rise…

Some BIGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG wines.

Then, Haut Brion is perfection, Lafite is brilliant, Margaux is ‘grand’, Gaffeliere killed it (an estate on a very significant roll), Baron is better than Comtesse and the second labels are notably delicious.

Will be interesting to see what Jancis and James make of those wines.

3 Likes

Lieven, absolutely appropriate to quote someone and I can’t deny I’m not interested, but then, if someone is starting their Bordeaux En Primeur phrase bingo card, they can chalk that one up.
Some others that are likely:
“You can’t taste the alcohol” (referring to wines that are 14.5% and above)
“Somewhere between 2010 and 2016.”
“Probably the best I’ve ever tasted from this estate.”
I’m sure others can think of likely candidates… (forgive the cynicism)

2 Likes

I absolutely agree Robert. After more than 40 years buying Bdx en primeur, I have learned to be cautious.
That’s why I read as much critics as possible and when they are unanimous, I think I have limited my risk to the maximum. I wrote “think” because the “knowing” only exists in the glass …

It would be super helpful, perhaps more than ever, to get the ABV for each wine this year particularly given that Nick has put the G into big…….

Not a determinant for any purchase or non-purchase but helpful context. Not sure I’ve had many 15% wines where you can’t taste the alcohol for instance…

2 Likes

I feel for those who have to speak for a region about a vintage whether good or bad. I mean no one who works in Bordeaux can ever really say “To be honest is was not great this year, think I will trying out some of those interesting wines from another part of the world.” Or “Yes pretty good, but if I am honest last year was a bit better and will probably be better value.” Also fairly uneducated on Bordeaux. But here is my evolving dictionary for interpreting vintage speak:

What is said - What I should hear
Inconsistent, but some bright spots - Most stuff is complete rubbish, do not touch with a barge pole
A drinker’s vintage - Pretty dire, the collectors will buy, a chance to go up the quality scale if you have to
Excellent all round - Normal wines for the region
The bouquet / length / structure etc remind me of 1982 / 1990 / 2005 etc - Normal wines for the region
Outstanding in parts, overall quality across the board very high - Some quite good wines, generally just normal for the area
Vintage of the decade - Some good wines, but don’t be thinking its all going to be great. Expect 3 to 4 in a decade.
Vintage of the century - A good vintage. Expect 1 per decade.
Best since 1945/1963 etc - Now this is probably really good, though probably on average 3 other vintages as good since the one quoted

Or perhaps I am too cynical…

16 Likes

Haha - that’s kind of hard to argue with…

One other thing as a relative newcomer that has me a bit flummoxed. Why does there often seem to be much better ‘value’ in back vintages? If ‘value’ is very simplistically wine critic scores and overall vintage quality vs price, and appreciating everyone has different tastes.

Is there a ‘shiny and new’ premium? Is the secondary market that inefficient? Are the newer vintages not trading much at those prices, so that it’s not a ‘real’ price? Are improving vineyard practices thought to trump critic scores? Has there been critic score deflation over time? Are people locking in allocations for future vintages? A bit of everything?

I’ve only been active for some years, so perhaps this is a newer dynamic with all the broader market turmoil we have seen during that period? Or maybe it’s not so prevalent as my mind believes it is?

Any thoughts appreciated!

That’s exactly why we do this thread! To figure out where true value lies - whether a new release or a back vintage that’s not caught up with pricing of the new vintage.

I’ll be guided by Jancis and James in terms of which comparative vintages we need to look at. I
Imagine it’ll be 2020 and 2018 for starters but we may need to look at different vintages for different communes. Oh, and the comparative analysis will really be for the top 60 Chateau releases, maybe around 100 labels including the second wines.

A fresh theme i’d love to see explored this year, though which falls outside of the scope of relative value analysis, is how Bordeaux is innovating or adapting to demand.

For example the Franc de Pied bottling from Chateau Dauzac. The main Dauzac wine is more restaurant list staple than en primeur collectible, but creating a premium bottling from what must be among the few ungrafted vines in Margaux is really interesting. Jane Anson points out these vines result in wines with higher acidity - useful in a HOTTT vintage!

Then there’s the brilliant Durfort-Vivens now also making Durfort Vivens Nature - a 100% Cabernet Sauvignon cuvée made in Amphorae and bottled without any sulphur, all for €35 a bottle. No oak coats the metaphorical lips of this wine, and it’s all the more chiselled for it.

These initiatives are surely part of the adaptation process that’ll make Bordeaux once again more appealing to a broader market, and dare I say, even mildly cool.

Basically, yes.

No, rather the reverse. Back in the Seventies, Parker was known to give Margaux a score of 83 or something. These days, it is effectively impossible for a wine critic who cares about their reputation to give a First Growth anything less than 95 (or equivalent) en primeur, because it would indicate that their taste buds were in the wrong place.(That said, I don’t think the top chateaux ever release anything as poor and weedy as they did in the Seventies. Or I should say, ‘as I have heard they released in the Seventies’, as I haven’t personally drunk any.)
The Bordeaux En Primeur marketing train is the wine collecting equivalent of Fixed Odds Betting Terminals for bookmakers’ shops. It’s fun, addictive, and a very easy way to lose much of your disposable income. If it goes well, it is fantastically profitable for merchants; for example, Farr Vintners sold £60 million of wine just from the 2009 Bordeaux En Primeur campaign. This for wine which, 80% of the time still will not have been drunk, and 95% of the time, is still available to buy.
That year was probably the apex for Bordeaux En Primeur, but it still excites interest: just look at this thread. When the emails start flying in, the newby wine buyer can think they’re going to miss out if they don’t snap up their ‘allocation’. To be fair to Burgundy, that’s genuinely the case, albeit the cost is stratospheric, for the quantities there are so low that the top wines just disappear never to be seen on merchants’ shelves again. For Bordeaux, if you can afford it, you can basically always buy any vintage of any major chateau at any time.

That said, in comparison with the other mega En Primeur region, Burgundy, Bordeaux prices are looking relatively low. It was the other way around when I started getting interested in wine in the early 2000s.

Finally, there’s always the hope that this will be the year when En Primeur prices are genuine bargains. Alas, this tends only ever to happen after a major financial crisis which can throw the chateaux off balance. Hence the 2008s, released in 2009, were quite good value.
But if you’re up for it, you can’t argue with Nick Martin’s numbers.

1 Like

“Finally, there’s always the hope that this will be the year when En Primeur prices are genuine bargains. Alas, this tends only ever to happen after a major financial crisis which can throw the chateaux off balance. Hence the 2008s, released in 2009, were quite good value.”

And, I think, 2019 - released into Covid lockdown in 2020 at reduced prices vs. 2018, and also (gasp) vs. the now very unfancied 2017. Especially given that the critics’ view of this vintage seems to be improving further with age if anything. Only those two years (2008 and 2019) come to mind since the first big price hike of my time interested (similar to yours Robert) in 2005.

2 Likes

That’s because it was awful back then p:slight_smile:

Well, Pontet-Canet was seen as only fit for the SNCF dining cars at the time, so anything is possible I suppose. Though I’d always be willing to test whether that 83 for Margaux was warranted or not :slight_smile:

1 Like

Regarding ratings I was shocked by the number of wines from the 2020 vintage that received 100 points when tasted in bottle.
Sadly, I abstained from buying Canon EP because I thought the price difference with the 2019 vintage was excessive. Bad decision (not the first one when it comes to buying fine wine).

JM Quarin already has 7 wines with a perfect score …
Since Parker has left the wine scene (and in his last years 2009 / 2010) I have indeed seen à significant growing club of 100/100 wines. 3 possibilities : or the wines become beter and better, or the critics become more and more benevolent, or both.